During our research we interviewed, among other people, senior logistics and transportation executives who claimed to be carrying out workforce planning. When we asked what financial metrics guided their human-capital choices—deciding, say, whether to hire full- or part-time drivers—few had any answer. These executives had drawn no connection between workforce planning and financial performance and were therefore flying blind.
To trace the bottom-line impact of higher workforce productivity, a company must identify the barriers to it and model their cost. Consider a corporate-law firm that has a lackluster development or retention strategy and high levels of attrition among its lawyers. The firm has determined that a 10 percent fall in attrition could raise billable utilization rates by 2 percent. To find out how to cut attrition, the firm could use software to track work patterns; it might find, for instance, that junior lawyers working with a particular combination of senior partners were twice as likely to quit as their peers. It could then respond by adjusting the way cases were assigned. For a law firm with annual billings of $100 million, a 2 percent increase in billable utilization rates would far outweigh the cost of installing software to target the sources of attrition.
